6/14/2016: Met with Monica Dailey from C & E, and Jules over at LAB to look at our space needs. We decided on the McCue Auditorium for most of the day, with the workshop to be held in Rm206A/B, lunch on the second floor lounge and English conference room, and breaks on the first floor.
I filled out the Visitor Parking Pass request and spoke to Dave in Parking, and will drop that off today. Parking will be requested in the T lot - no charge.
I updated the online schedule with room assignments (though the DC website appears to be down at the moment).
I will meet with library colleagues today to plan a Thursday night event - ideas include:
Wine & Cheese reception (maybe without the wine)
Tour of the library and archives
Dine Arounds
Tour of downtown
Pick up registration packets
Talked to Patty Sorel (2379), confirmed our arrangements for the User Group meeting, and our reservation for the NY Room for 9/30. (6/21/2016)
Talked to Susan Vasquez, building coordinator for LAB about air conditioning and use of TV. She referred me to Facilities (2408) for the HVAC, and said the process for using the monitors is to get them approved by the building (deans, etc.) and then it goes to Kurt for uploading. They would need to be pdf. Very cool! I can send her a sample of the slideshow next week for approval, and then the final product can go directly to Kurt. (6/22/2016)
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Monday, February 8, 2016
Setting up a FC2 drive (for writers_forum)
Step 1: Request the drive through Fileshare
Request in the Service Catalog under Security and Access https://suny.service-now.com/
Step 2: Decide on a share name: writers_forum
Step 3: Who will need access? A consistent group, or will it change from year to year? Will everyone have read/write access to all folders, will some remain private, and/or will some users only be able to read, but not write?
Step 4: Provide a list of netids for access. (CORE: apanning, rwblack, rcushman, kmyers, ccowling. GRAD: Cwess1) – Will need to add bcherry.
Step 5: When share owner is notified, they need to let the users know. In theory, anyone can then map the drive to their desktop.
Step 2: Decide on a share name: writers_forum
Step 3: Who will need access? A consistent group, or will it change from year to year? Will everyone have read/write access to all folders, will some remain private, and/or will some users only be able to read, but not write?
Step 4: Provide a list of netids for access. (CORE: apanning, rwblack, rcushman, kmyers, ccowling. GRAD: Cwess1) – Will need to add bcherry.
Step 5: When share owner is notified, they need to let the users know. In theory, anyone can then map the drive to their desktop.
2016-01-26 14:46:00 EST - Kevin ColagioAdditional comments
Kim,
We don't contact anyone when it's done. You are listed as the owner.
Any of them will be able to map the drive to a drive letter of their choice. If they need help with this, they can contact the helpdesk or there is probably a knowledge base article somewhere (I haven't dug into that part of Service Now yet...).
If you want, I could send the ticket back to the Helpdesk and they may be able to advise you better...?
--Kevin.
We don't contact anyone when it's done. You are listed as the owner.
Any of them will be able to map the drive to a drive letter of their choice. If they need help with this, they can contact the helpdesk or there is probably a knowledge base article somewhere (I haven't dug into that part of Service Now yet...).
If you want, I could send the ticket back to the Helpdesk and they may be able to advise you better...?
--Kevin.
Thursday, January 14, 2016
Writers Forum Open Access Project
In late October, 2015 I received notification that I was awarded a $1500 Harold Hacker Award Fund for the Advancement of Libraries. Here is the budget narrative:
The funding
would be used to hire an intern for 300 hours @ $12.00/hr, who would first update
the 2007 inventory to determine the current state of the collection. He or she would
then build a showcase collection on Brockport’s open access institutional
repository, Digital Commons@Brockport (http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/), and move 40 existing audio
files currently behind a firewall in iTunes, 22 existing video files found on
SUNY’s DSpace platform, and 18 existing digital files that are stored on local
hard drives to this site. Metadata would be added to enhance the
discoverability of the collection, and the catalog records would be created or
updated, and links would be updated on the departmental and library webpages. Historical
posters, programs and other archival material would be scanned to round out the
collection.
While I asked for $3600, I received less than half of that. Since the premiere goal was to create an online, open access collection that is what I will have to focus on.
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
Social media experiences
The Peter Singer story:
I’m guessing you know who Peter Singer is, having taught
philosophy, so I’ll jump right in with the story. Late this summer, we received
a request from a publisher to reprint an article (by Peter Singer) that
appeared in the 1974 edition of the Philosophic Exchange. This is the first
time that we’ve received such a request when it wasn’t on behalf of the author
of the article. In those cases, it’s an automatic yes. In this case, I searched
out Dr. Singer, who was still active and teaching at Princeton, and sent him an
email explaining the situation and telling him that (although we held the
copyright), we were passing this request on to him. Whatever remuneration there
was, should go to him, as well as the decision as to whether he wanted his work
to appear in this forthcoming publication. I quickly received a nice note back
thanking me, and saying he would respond to the request. Then, last week, that
same paper came up as our Featured Paper of the Day, and I tweeted it, and sent
him my congratulations PotD email. He immediately responded, and tweeted it
himself. Almost instantaneously there was a flurry of activity on the website,
and people all over the world started downloading this article. We had more
than 300 downloads of that article in the next few hours. It was fascinating to
watch those pins drop.
Establishing the alumni connection:
This next story is chronicled below. When this month’s Activity
Updates came out, I identified 5 or 6 people, whose works were in part
responsible for areas in which the repository excelled in the previous month.
Several were from the Education department. For each of those, I sent a little
congratulatory email (as seen below) to the author, and copied their advisor
in, as well. Finally, I sent a summary on to Janka, the department chair. I was
pleased to see that Frank, one of the advisors, followed up with his own email
to the student. I think that one will mean more to Karen, than anything I could
send, and it represents to me another way that Digital Commons can help build
and maintain connections with Brockport’s alumni.
All this being said, I know I don’t do nearly the amount of
marketing or work in social media that I did in the early days of the IR, but
experiences like these convince me that the time is worth the effort!
Correspondence with Geneseo re: repository policies
Being Brockport, we didn’t really have a lot of policies in
place when we started the IR. So my answers will be a combination of policy and
practice.
On whether submission is mandatory:
Our first thesis collection was the Environmental Science and
Biology collection, which came out of a discussion with a professor, who was
also chair of the graduate committee at the time. They started requiring their
students to submit to them their thesis on CD, along with their print copies to
be bound. The Education department came along next, and they were open to the
idea of actually having the students submit their thesis to Digital Commons,
and the advisor would do a final approval and it would be published. About a
year into the repository initiative, the Graduate School submitted a proposal
to the College Senate asking for it to be mandatory that theses that would
normally be submitted to the library for binding, be submitted digitally to the
IR. The department could still bind, if they wished but the IR was the primary
depository. Has that been adhered to? Marginally. It continues to be an
educational process, but I believe the 3 biggest departments comply.
On how we receive permission:
Our thesis collection is two pronged – retrospective and
born-digital. The born-digital collection has a click through agreement that
the student checks before they submit their thesis. Here is a link to the
instruction guide (found in the sidebar of each collection) http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/ehd_theses/submission_guide.pdf
that we provide each department. It works the student through the process step
by step, and shows a piece of the permission agreement. For our retrospective
theses, we digitize and try and find emails to ask permission to upload. This
tends to be time consuming, and I admit that I have many more theses digitized
than I am currently able to upload, so I have put a moratorium on doing any
more at this point. We have a Thesis Digitization Policy, based on University
of South Florida’s listed on our website http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/thesis_digitization_policy.pdf
.
Creative work and other lessons learned:
As some of the original champions have retired or moved away,
questions have arisen such as: we don’t want our students research published
before we get a chance to publish (the sciences), or what about work that isn’t
quite good enough to be in the IR, or what about if the student wants to
publish in the future? So, just about a year ago, we started allowing embargos
(one year automatic for EnvSci, and one year renewable for Bio). Some of the
creative writers who gave permission have come back with individual requests
(could I take this down – I think if Mrs. XXX read it, they might sue me for
libel; I want to self-publish- it is allowed if it’s on the IR?) Those kinds of
questions. I offer to provide a link in the metadata to their “published” book.
English gives their graduates a choice of whether to submit or not, in fact,
I’m not sure that they even tell them about it, to be honest.
Is it worth the time and effort?
I’m not sure which platform you are thinking about for your IR.
We have been very happy with bepress and Digital Commons, but here’s my caveat:
you will get out of it, what you are willing to put into it. If you look at the
5 IR’s in the http://suny.researchcommons.org/
, 3 of us started at about the same time. Only one of us has a full time IR
manager and the difference in size of collections and number of downloads is
noticeable. But, it depends on what your goals are for the IR. I consider
Digital Commons a part of the Brockport marketing plan, and align my goals with
the strategic goals of the college, and the strategic goals of the library.
I’m sorry, you ask a simple question, and I answer with an
essay. Please let me know if there is anything else you need to know.
Kim
From: Allison Brown [mailto:browna@geneseo.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 12:17 PM
To: Myers, Kim
Subject: Question about Digital Commons
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 12:17 PM
To: Myers, Kim
Subject: Question about Digital Commons
Hi Kim,
We were beginning a conversation about IRs with a faculty
here at Geneseo, and I was wondering if I could ask some questions about your
experiences with the digital repository at Brockport.
I noticed you have a fair amount of student theses and
dissertations available through digital commons, and was wondering if you had
any insight into how individual departments handle this. For example, is it
mandatory, and do the students sign a release?
We are also curious if any of the theses you host are
creative writing, and if so, what were the discussions leading up to including
these types of student work in the repository. Our faculty member is advocating
to include all types of student work, but has heard some arguments against
providing open access to unpublished student creative work, and I was curious
whether this was a conversation you had at Brockport while setting up policies
for Digital Commons.
Any insight you have would be helpful!
Wednesday, December 30, 2015
GVSU Author recognition information
Hi Kim,
It was great talking to you this morning. Here is the link to the
full PDFs of the bibliographies, http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/ar_archives/. And
here is the link to the event community in our repository http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/author_recognition/.
I quick looked and GVSU has a total of 1678 faculty members
for reference.
Thank you for your kind words about our repository, it looks like
you’re doing great things at Brockport as well!
Let me know if there is anything else I can share with you.
Jackie
Jacklyn Rander
Publishing Services Manager
Grand Valley State University Libraries
240 Mary Idema Pew Library
616-331-2623
Tuesday, December 29, 2015
Best Practices for Creating a Successful IR Day
Best Practices for Creating a Successful IR Day
|
Josh Cromwell, Institutional Repository Coordinator of The Aquila Digital
Community at the University of Southern Mississippi, shares best
practices for creating a successful IR day:
• Gather collaborative campus-wide support, including funds for
the day’s activities.
• Request a recognized keynote speaker and other leaders in the field to participate.
• Remember that you only need one willing institution in a region in order to create a community-wide IR day.
• Request a recognized keynote speaker and other leaders in the field to participate.
• Remember that you only need one willing institution in a region in order to create a community-wide IR day.
Josh was originally inspired by the emphasis at ACRL's 2014
Scholarly Communication Roadshow on the key importance of IRs in today’s
scholarly landscape. If the University of Southern Mississippi was leading the
IR movement in the region, Josh reasoned, “it seemed logical to me that we
should leverage that opportunity to provide training and workshops for the
other universities who were also interested in pursuing an IR of their own.”
Indeed, the day became an inspiration to USM’s peers in the Mississippi region.
In creating the first Southern Mississippi IR Day in 2015, Josh
spoke to the importance of a collaborative campus-wide effort to support the
hosting institution:
“The Libraries generously provided most of the funding needed to
make the event happen, and the Friends of the University Libraries generously
provided funding to purchase lunch for all attendees. The day included a panel
discussion with faculty members from each of our six academic colleges across
campus, and several participants in our current IR initiatives also agreed to
come and speak about their projects and experiences. This broad base of
participation really enhanced the quality of the day's presentations.”
The addition of a recognized keynote speaker and the
participation of other leaders in the field also helped to offer a high level
of discourse and lively sessions. Josh details their experience:
“We were tremendously honored to have Marilyn Billings from UMass
Amherst agree to be our keynote speaker for the day, and in addition to her
riveting keynote, she and Jeanne Pavy from the University of New Orleans each
led incredibly helpful workshops during the afternoon session.”
Josh reports that
“the response to the first IR Day has been overwhelmingly
positive”—congratulations!—and many attendees are already looking forward to
the next IR Day. In addition to the best practices above, the 2015 Scholarly Communications Experts Directory
can help connect organizers with experts who may travel to their campus to
partner in creating an IR Day. Feel free to contact outreach@bepress.com with any questions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)